高级口译2010年3月真题（附加答案）(3)

(C) destroy the self-esteem of both the UK and the US (D) hurt the United States except the United Kingdom

15. What is the best title for the passage?

(A) ―Police state‖: America in the eyes of the UK public

(B) ―The mother country‖: Britain and America fought two world wars (C) The British national psyche of self-importance (D) The ally the British love to hate

Questions 16—20

History may soon become extinct in our secondary schools, only less missed and less lamented than before. A new study by the Historical Association found that 3 out of 10 comprehensives no longer bother to teach the subject, which isn‘t part of the core curriculum after the age of 13. Only 30 per cent do GCSE history. The researchers interviewed 700 history teachers. Most British kids can name every contestant appearing in The X Factor, but a substantial number don‘t know about the Battle of Trafalgar, 20 per cent believe the Germans, Spanish or Americans once occupied Britain and some th ink Winston Churchill was the first man to walk on the moon.

And who were the dunces who decided to make this subject optional? Why the Tories when last they ruled over us. That was then. Today‘s Tories are ardent History Bo ys, eager to return to the days when the past was hammered into the heads of the young, or embellished tales of glory to give British children an inheritance of innate superiority. Michael Gove, Shadow Schools Secretary for Children, has been banging on about this for a while and earlier this year the Tory Andrew Rosindell raised the issue in parliament, but regrettably turned a serious debate into brassy, right-wing patriotism: ―The peoples of these magnificent British Isles...have a rich and proud history like no other‖. Really, sir? So Fat Henry and his sorry wives or Churchill only have to stand up to blank out the histories of Egypt, Turkey, Mexico, Austria, Greece, India, France, Iran and other old lands? Many of us who long passionately for the reinstatement of history as a core GCSE subject are now concerned about the substance and purpose behind the Tory plans to do just that. They have a burning desire to use history as a feelgood hallucinogen, get its band of revisionist stars to head up the cavalry, to lead us back to the future. As this prospect approaches, at times I think the current state of ignorance may prove to be less harmful.When politicians exploit these and turn them into propaganda, the results can be lethal.

We are not immune. Thousands of Britons today swallow the BNP‘s message and vote for racist views, thus betraying the legacy of their iconic war against Nazism and the millions of Indians, Africans, Chinese, Caribbeans and others who fought with this country in both world wars. When the BBC hosts these blackguards on its most prestigious programmes and uses democracy as an excuse, it too is guilty of treacherous historical amnesia. Arguably, the lack of good historical education makes our citizens more open to neo-Nazi brain-washers. Young Muslims too, are easily plucked off by charismatic Islamicists who weave fictionalised accounts of splendiferous Islamic epochs when they did no wrong and brought paradise to earth.

There is another disconcerting trend. Britain is deeply conservative and these days looks back longingly to the Tudors, Georgians, Victorians, Edwardians, wartime Britons, and now the Sixties. Showman historians provide our public with an entertaining and comforting view of what has gone before. Audiences are never really forced to question things or feel troubled. If we are to

reinst ate history as a key subject in secondary schools, we must do so with a better understanding of its impact, and design th e syllabus to tell as full a story as possible of this complicated nation and its connections to the world. Few in power have the imagination to take up this challenge because that would be too tricky. Yet our childr en have a right to learn about British fascism as well as the battles and ultimate victory over Hitler; they need to be taught about how this country set up the endless conflict in Palestine, and the mistakes made by the British government when Zimbabwe was created. Hardly anyone over 20 in Britain knows this. The coming generations surely must, if only to understand the games played during the bitter Cold War, particularly as we may be returning to those days.

The long neglected positive aspects of our history also need to be exhumed. As left-wing historians often point out, the hard-won democratic rights we enjoy were not bestowed by kings and the landed gentry, but were wrested by oppressed peasants, industrial working classes and the abject poor. Most black, Asian and Arab British children do not know about the many white anti-Imperialist MPs and an alarming number are woefully ignorant of the erudite Arabists who loved the Middle East and its many cultures. If we had known better the history of Iraq and Afghanistan, our government might have avoided the foolhardy and disastrous interventions that have left us with no credit. I write here as one of the ignoramuses. I was not taught anything about Afghanistan and have only now started to understand a little more about the people and the places.

Oscar Wilde wrote: ―The one duty we owe to history is to rewrite it‖. And having rewritten it as honestly as possible, to teach it to those who will inherit our land.

16. When the author says ―today‘s Tories are ardent History Boys‖ (para. 2),he implies that _____. (A) the Tories should be responsible for having made the subject of history optional (B) the Tories have realised the mistakes they made in the past

(C) the Tories plan to resume the course of history in secondary education (D) the Tories want to use history to gain back the ruling power of the country

17. Which of the follo …… 此处隐藏：15501字，全部文档内容请下载后查看。喜欢就下载吧 ……